Skill system was streamlined, which is good - old skills didn't really made a lot of sense for FPS game. Dialogue system is meh - charisma checks are horribly done, dialogue wheel - because apparently, every game is now taking that questionable approach to dialogue from Mass Effect - doesn't really works well for F4. Or, it can be fun when enemies don't act retarded. With all that said - Bethesda did manage to improve the shooting mechanics greatly. If your game looks like it was made 3 years ago - it should have the hardware requirements of a game made 3 years ago. I refuse to accept and let the shitty performance of F4 slide. W3 was a bitch to run on release, but at least - it looked damn good, so it was understandable. There is no justification for crappy performance, other than 'Bethesda used their old engine and saved money'. In Fallout 4 - the textures look like shit, there are no shadows cast from 3/4 of the light sources, animations look like shit, the AI is beyond retarded. If the game is a resource hog, it must at least look like its putting all those clock cycles its gobbling up to some use. W3 had performance problems on launch, and even now, its problematic for some - but goddamit, its simply not justified in case of Fallout 4. Not to mention other performance issues, random FPS drops and animation glitches.

I don't care how much the poor developers would get no vacations - you don't release a game that forces 144hz monitor users to reduce their refresh rate to accomodate your shitty engine. The fact that Fallout 4 bugs out constantly if you exceed 80fps is pathetic. Fallout 4 characters are stale and one-dimensional. In terms of story, main and side-quests - Witcher 3 wins, hands down. But while its good, its certainly isn't the best.

If it was so, Minecraft is the best game ever made.

Witcher 3 vs fallout 4